Video Transcript:
My biggest concern and question is no one has a bigger reason to lie than Glenn Maxwell. And now her team is already coming out and saying, we had a very productive meeting with the Justice Department.
Like, I'm sure you did. You have something he wants. He has something you want. Everybody wins. So how do we ensure her credibility?
So this is why the actual subpoena of the Epstein files is so important. Anything that Glenn Maxwell actually says, we have to know that she is saying such, possibly because she wants a pardon. She wants to reduce her sentence, and she's going to do whatever she can while protecting Donald Trump to get her sentence reduced.
So that is a fact. We also know, by the way, that this is a bad person. She was involved in sex trafficking of children. She is a liar. So let's be really clear about who she is, right. And so that should concern us. This DOJ meeting should concern us. But when we have our deposition with her, the oversight committee in August, by August 11th looks like it's looking like the date when we actually get to interview her as oversight Democrats and Republicans, we will need to then look at what she says and what she talks about, and then match that with evidence in the files, on the videos and the documents.
And so we're not going to take what she says on her own. It's got to be corroborated with actual evidence that we actually find in the Epstein files, which is why that subpoena of the document is so important to actually her credibility, because we just cannot believe or take her word just because she says so. It's got to be matched with actual evidence.
I saw the letter that you sent to James Comer. Now he is going to issue the subpoena. Does he have a time limit on when he has to issue that subpoena?
I mean, look, it needs to be expeditiously. I think the subpoena for Glenn Maxwell happened within a couple of days of the actual vote that we took in the oversight committee. And so we would expect that in the next few days, week or so, he should issue the subpoena. Now, he's already committed to issuing the subpoena.
He has said it publicly. He has told news outlets he's going to issue the subpoena. And so that was step one — getting him to actually do it, which is good. We've told him and said, hey, look, if you're going to actually issue the subpoena, let's put a time limit on it. So we think that 30 days is an appropriate amount of time for the DOJ to collect the documents unredacted and give over the full files, videos, documents, whatever the hell they have over to the oversight committee so that we have a chance to actually review all the documents.
And of course, it's our intention. We want to be able to make all this information public, of course. So there's going to be a process to get that done. But that's what's really important to us. It's really the Democrats on the committee. And so very good steps toward transparency in the last few days. And honestly, because we fought so hard to get it done.
Share this post